1. CREATION OF H.U.F
It
is incorrect to say that HUF is created. The existence of HUF is a natural
presumption of Hindu law unless contrary is proved. We cannot create a HUF, as HUF is creation
of nature itself-birth of a child in a Hindu family leads to creation of a new
HUF.
What
we people call “creation of HUF files” –means the creation of property of HUF
and then income from such property, in a lawful manner.
In
most of Hindu families, features of HUF already exist but in order to have HUF
status in the eyes of income tax law the family should have funds and derive a
taxable income thereof.
A NEW HUF CAN BE CREATED IN THE FALLOWING
WAYS;
1. By making gift to HUF.
2. By will in
favor of HUF.
3. By joint
acquisition of property.
4. By complete
partition of HUF.
5. By complete
partition & then reunion of HUF.
All the methods are discussed in detailed
later in this book.
2. MULTIPLE H.U.Fs
Like every other person, a HUF is
given a name for identification. It is normally referred to as “Name of the
karta(HUF)”. There might be situations when a person might be a karta in more
than one HUF. For example, ‘X’ might constitute a HUF along with his two
younger brothers, his spouse, the spouses of his brothers and the children of
all the brothers. In this HUF, since he is the oldest surviving male member, he
will be the karta. This HUF will be “X (HUF)”.’X’ may also be the karta of the HUF consisting of
himself, his wife and children.
To avoid any
difficulty in identification, the first HUF is identified as (BHUF) and the
second as ‘X’ (SHUF) where BHUF and SHUF stand for bigger HUF and smaller HUF
respectively.
A
smaller HUF may also be created by partial partitions of a HUF which is now
de-recognised, due to the operation of section 171(9) of the Income Tax ACT
through recognized under the Hindu law.
Where a smaller HUF is created as a
taxable entity, one would appreciate that the basic exemption, the lower slab
rates of tax and other deduction will be available there by helping in planning
to reduce the tax liability.
Where the HUF consist of sizable
members, it may be advantageous to form multiple HUFs. In such process one
member of HUF release his right in one property and Bring another HUF into
existence in which other members of HUF other than the members who relinquishes
his right will be the members of that HUF. Similarly relinquishment of rights
would be done by other member in other properties one by one and thus bringing
the new entity in the status of HUF in existence. In other words, a number of
HUFs can be brought in to existence by process of relinquishment of rights in
the properties. Thus reduction in tax liability may be achieved by dividing the
existing income among number of
different taxable entities.
This concept of multiple HUF has
been accepted by Gujarat High court in the case of C.I.T vs. Shanti kumar jagabai 1051TR 795. However, it may be noted
that this idea of multiple HUF is yet to receive the blessing of the supreme
court of India .
3.SUMMARY OF
IMPORTANT SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
1. Gowli Buddana
vs. CIT (1966) 60 ITR 293 (SC): TC 37R.121
For an HUF to be a taxable entity under
income tax Act, it is not always necessary that there should be two male
members.
2. N.V.
Narendranath vs. CWT (1969) 74 ITR 190 (SC): TC 65R.557) If there are two
coperceners in the family, it is not necessary that HUF should always have
ancestral property for the income of such HUF to be taxable in the status of an
HUF.
3.Surjitlal Chhabda vs. CIT 1976 CTR
(SC)1470: (1975)101 ITR 776 (SC) : TC 37R. 132
(a) If an HUF consists of a coparcener and
wife and unmarried daughter i.e. there is only one male member, the income
arising to the HUF out of ancestral funds would be taxable in HUF.
(b) However, if the funds are not ancestral
then until a son is born, the income will continue to be taxed in the hands of
the sole coparcener.
4. K.S. Subbaih pillai vs. CIT (1999)237
ITR 11 (SC)
If the income is earned on account of
investment of HUF funds then the income will be taxable in the status of an
HUF.
However if the income is earned on account
of personal skill and exertion of the coparcener without investment of HUF
funds, then the income would be taxable in the hands of the coparcener as an
“individual”
No comments:
Post a Comment