Audit & Assurance | Business Start up & Registration | Business Support | Tax Advisory | Management Consultancy | Visa Documentation | Project Syndication & Feasibility Studies

Saturday, 28 June 2014


1 .What is HUF?
            The income tax act, 1961 does not define the expression “HUF” the reason of this omission is that this expression has a well known connotation under the Hindu law.
            The HUF is a separate taxable entity under the I.T Act, as the term has not been defined any where by the said act, it should be construed in the sense in which it is understood under the Hindu law. A joint Hindu family consist of a persons lineally descended from a common ancestor and includes their wives and unmarried daughters. The daughter, on married, ceases to be a member of her father’s family and become a member of her Husband’s family.

2. Different schools of Hindu law?
Two types of joint family system prevail according to Hindu traditions:
(i)                 Mitakshara joint family system.
(ii)               Dayabhaga joint family system.
            In case of Mitakshara joint family – Father, sons, grandsons and grate grandsons all are considered as coparcener in the family.
            A female cannot be considered as coparcener in Mitakshara joint family system. It is very easy to create a new HUF file if a coparcenary exists e.g. father & son or two married brothers living jointly in the same house or ancestral house, because the normal state of a HUF is that, it is joint in food, worship and estate.
In case Dayabhaga joint family there is no coparcenary between father & sons. Here son will become coparcener on the death of their father. For example, if a person is having three sons (three brothers) will become coparcener in the family.
Notes: (i) A female can be a coparcener in dayabhaga joint family system.
(ii).Existence of one male member is essential in dayabhaga  joint family system.
(iii).Dhayabhaga school of law prevails in West Bengal and Assam. Both Mitakshara & Dayabhaga joint family system take in to account the relation up to four generations for the determination of coparcener.
For income tax purpose Mitakshara & Dhayabhaga HUF have the same effect in the eye of law. Mitakshara school of law applies to the whole of India except west Bengal and Assam.

            Through jain and sick families are not governed by the Hindu law, such families are treated as Hindu Undivided families for the purpose of the Income Tax Act.

Mulla’s principles of hindu law (14th edition), states in that regard as under;
            “The word Hindu does not denote any particular religion or community. During the last hundred years and more it has been a nomenclature used to refer comprehensively to various categories of people for purposes of personal law. It has been applied to dissenter and non-conformists and even to those who have entirely repudiated Brahmanism. It has been applied to various religious sects and bodies which in various periods and in circumstances developed out of, or split off from, the Hindu system but whose members have nevertheless continued to live under the hindu law, and the courts have generally put a liberal construction upon enactments relating to the personal laws applicable to Hindus,”

       I.      Not only to Hindus by religion, i.e., converts to Hinduism;
(i)                 To illegitimate children where both parents are Hindus;
(ii)               To illegitimate children where the father is a christian and the mother is a Hindu, and the children are brought up as Hindus.
(iii)             To Jains Buddhists in India, Sikhs and Nambudri Brahmins,
(iv)             To a hindu by birth who, having renounced Hinduism has reverted to it after performing the religious rites of expiation and repentance, or he was recognised as a Hindu by his community;
(v)               To brahmos; to Arya Samajist; and to santhals
(vi)             To hindus who make a declaration that they were not Hindus for the purpose of the special marriage Act, 1872.

            As observed by their lordship of the supreme court in C Krishna Prasad vs Commissioner of Income – Tax, Bangalore (1974)97 ITR 493(SC) at page 496, the word “family” always signifies a group. Plurality of persons is essential attribute of the family. A single person male or female does not constitute a family. He or she would remain, what is inherent in the very nature of the things, an individual, lonely individual is a contradiction in terms. The same results also fallows from section 2(31) of the Act, which treats a Hindu undivided family as an entity different from an individual.

            It fallows there fore, that the assessment in the status of Hindu undivided family made only when there are two or more members to form a Hindu undivided family. A joint hindu family consist of persons lineally descended from a common ancestor and includes their wives and unmarried daughters. The daughter, on marriage, ceases to be a member of her father’s family and become a member of her husband’s family.

            According Mitakshara joint family system property inherited from father, grandfather or grate grand father is known as ancestral property as a source will also be the HUF property. Any person can blend or through use of this ancestral property as a source will also be the HUF property. Any person can blend or throw his individual property in to the common funds of the family but for blending or throwing of one’s separate property in to the common funds of the family, it is existence of HUF which is essential.

HUF being a common feature in hindu society may yield fallowing tax benefit:-

            In case of an individual assessee, who is also a member of HUF property is not considered for deriving at the total income of that person as an individual, As HUF property. Total partition of HUF, expenses like remuneration, interest, commission etc. To the members there of for the service rendered and deductible. Total partition of HUF, is the best way to avoid income tax, capital gain tax, gift tax, wealth tax, stamp duty etc. because the property divided in the members through participation is not considered as transfer or disposition of the property.

We shall reach you again with the Process of Creation of HUF, and other nuances in our next post, you can reach us by submitting mail to get regular updates of Popular Posts.

No comments:

Post a Comment